Save Your kids from being used! Hurry!

Michelle Malkin while her parent’s home country is being flooded and children die, the pointless Tucker Carlson who compares President Obama to Khmer Rouge, everyone that works for Fox news, believe that a video of children singing during Black History month, Praising President Obama, was a Hitler “indoctrination” video. Of course, never really understanding hypocrisy, you heard complete silence when a pro-Bush video of children singing was unearthed.  I am sure that the conservatives knew that this is a none issue; it’s just that the morons that want to believe in indoctrination will believe it.

           So let’s recap:

Michelle Malkin, the pointless Tucker Carlson, everyone that works for Fox news, never tiring from using children to get at the Democrats or any left leaning human being, are truly like pedophiles. 

 

Yes, you heard it here first. The Conservative pundits are enslaving our children to crush the left. Prove me wrong!

Far, far left and right: they love keep things Whipped

William E. Sparkman is dead. We don’t know all the details of the Census Worker’s death. We don’t the why and the how. But it never stops those that are so politically polarizing from dragging this man, his family and his friends through the ringer. From Michelle Malkin, who constantly plays the victim of  the left, while goading her followers chase after people she dislikes, to Dan Riehl, who apparently, never even attempted fact-checking or let’s say Google, speculated that Mr. Sparkman had some sexual deviance, or the democratic underground that basically blamed the right for his death.

Meanwhile, the truth has been whipped, torn, and ultimately ruined for all of us all. Poor us

Admit it Libs you like this woman!

I must admit that my girlfriend is a Filipina. I freely give that information to you. She beautiful, polite and kind.

Which makes the idea of the whole concept of  the Filipina American Michelle Malkin so puzzling, and to many moderate liberals that truly want to be inclusive. This woman makes it too difficult. She destroys public discourse by ridiculing and snipping at the heals others. She assumed what was in President Obama’s speech to the nations children, without knowing the contents of that speech. And that is just one case of many.  It is so hard for libs to understand her thinking. Especially men. They look at her, and Damn, she is so sweet looking, but once that mouth opens, real objectivity loses out. We all lose.

She is gorgeous, smart and  I sometimes admiring her, then sometimes wondering if she is being coached by Satan himself. Yet, what is more important is that other more moderate or lesser dangerous  thinking people can look at her without cringing. Case in point: Howard Kurtz’s Ode to the hoty Michelle Malkin and Lloyd Grove’s softball telephone interview(Malkin’s having been threaten so much because of her inane and poor research and so finds it too scary to go out sometimes.) Both season news men, yet they softly go through the questions, and nothing other than a “Look, how cute and smart and rich she is” is really obtained from both interviews. Although it sounds like I am being mocking. Not on your life! I am proud that people, these two men, in fact, could even do such a thing in the present climate of hate left, hate right.  They represent something Mrs. Malkin could never be accused of: objective(well, mildly) journalism.

Where are the Liberals on this?

When employees were caught doing some underhand stupity at Acorn, who found out first? Looks like someone did their homework. His name is  James O’Keefe, a conservative film maker. And it was not a season journalist, as Jon Steward, a liberal fake journalist, had rightly mentioned? And if you look closely you will find most liberal online publications do not even cover the blip. The right wing found out, good for them.

James O'Keefe raises some interesting questions about Acorn

 But why don’t liberals follow up and denounce such behavior? Has the Huffington Post done so? Why only liberals like  Jon Steward?

Rep. Joe "You Lie!" Wilson's true face.

ANY QUESTIONS?

The Nut Crusade begins?

Have conservatives finally gone over the deep end? Jim Greer, GOP chairman of Florida complained in a news Propaganda release that the president is playing politics and using the children to “spread President Obama’s socialist ideology”., Michelle Malkin and Glenn Beck also join the nut crusade on a 15 minute speech. So, tell me, Can these people who have not seen the transcripts of this speech,  read what is in the President’s mind?

Razer wire and children don't mix: A picture that was never in Michelle Malkin's Book on japanese internment

Mrs. Malkin has a shiny new toy. Bash the President over the head using children. Trying to anticipate what the president might say in his upcoming address on Sept 8: what the conservatives call a stay-in-school speech, Mrs. Malkin in all her honest objective gossipy best ties him with left wing philosophy, and of course leaving out for the readers any possibility of waiting to hear the speech themselves, and make judgements for themselves.   As if not Stalking children was not enough, now Mrs. Malkin is going after the president. So what is she saying? Schools are not safe for your children anymore because this black president is in charge now?

Remember now this woman as a long history of using children to make her point. Think about how she tries to argue things.

In 2004, she wrote a thinly researched book “In defense of Racism Internment. What she realized, more she took advantage of , was the idea in 2004 people did not know (or cared anymore?) about what happen in 1942 or that the 1980′s ism culture of political correctness had posion young minds. If you do read her book note she does not spend any time talking about the children.  Of the 110,00 half, at least  were children. American children put in internment camps?

The book In defense of Internment Camps is not so much an indictment of Japanese nationals as well as US citizens, but a systematic bashing of the 1980 PC culture in which Mrs. Malkin grew to despise. Rationalizing, like many conservatives that this movement to multicultural, and other “isms”(which this author really never got into) was to blame for the poor victim mentality. It not only made her rich, it is a continuous form she revisit over and over.

This problem is that rationalizing 1942, where the rights of Minorities was slim at best: She never bothered to put it in context. And my contention is that she never bothered to research  indication that there was a hostile atmosphere against the Japanese during that time. What I mean is she Did NO RESEARCH on the idea that racism had something to do the internment camps. Instead she focuses on coded messages from MAGIC. She never even mentions the governors of the Western States and their xenophobic attitude toward the Japanese. Or even looked at the nationals laws during that time. The institutionalized racism of 1942 can never be compared to the strange, and weird 1980′s pop culture of Me!Me!Me! Jim Grow was very much alive during that time.

 Contextual errors does not make for a balanced and objective book, nor does rationalizing using children to make your point.   Every time children are involved in a topic Mrs. Malkin takes on, she spoon feeds people the rational that “ they used children, I can, too.”

Michelle Malkin actually says something nice about Islam?

Wonders of wonders, in a 2005 column for the white only,  Christian only website townhall,  Mrs. Malkin tells us something positive about Islam. I just about to give up on her in ability to be objective.  Here are her own words:

Nothing to see here. Move along. Islam is a peaceful religion. Stop asking so many damned questions.

Truly amazing!!!!

 

                     And I lived to see her say something nice???

Rude Update: Sept 25th.2009, Sorry, she was actually mocking the religion. Taking in the peaceful people along with the more angry wing of Islam, and not distinguishing the difference. Sounds a little like religious intolerence?

"Islam in America? Over my dead body!"

A few months ago, our queen of fear the Muslims posted this column at townhall. Here is a snippet:

America faces an ongoing Islamic jihad at home and abroad. Not merely “man-caused.” But Koran-inspired. Yet, Obama refuses to spell out the centuries-old roots of the war that he claims he’ll win faster, better and cleaner than any of his predecessors.

Note to self: weird right wing language logic:  since most jihads are made by “man” why even use the word  ”caused”? Is there a implication that some people think that Katrina caused the new Jihad??? or something. Since the Koran was written by “man” . . .oh forget it, I am already confused.

Note to self: still waiting for the “islamic Jihad” here in America. MMM I am still Waiting!!!

Another source, but which is yet to be confirmed, says that when Michelle Malkin  learned that Hosni Mubarak would be visiting the White House August 19, she grew angry, and the source which apparently came from  someone that over heard a cell phone conversation of someone else saying at a local bar in a seedy side of Hollywood, Florida. That. . .”Islam is all Obama’s fault.”  And accused his wife, Michelle Obama, not only of being a crony, but also of not dressing like a Real first lady, and that the first lady is ” helping her husband promote Islam.” All of this can not yet be confirmed but boy does that sound like Michelle Malkin.

Dick Cheney, The Dark Lord himself, speaks again?

Today, on Fox News Sunday,(the only news outlet he dares go on), he said that Obama “scares the hell out of me” This is in regard to the investigation of Justice Department in to the CIA “interrogations”  Why so glum Mr. Cheney? Afraid they will find your Dark Lord lightsabar?

UPDATE TO POST:  The author of this post would like to offer his apologies for misquoting former vice-president Cheney: Mr. Cheney’s actual responds to the calls for an investigation into “enhanced interrogation techniques” was that he was,  ”offended as hell.”  You can see it here.

Mike Malloy as envisioned by normal Liberals

Possibly the greatest gift Air America Radio gave us all was its decision to fire Mike Malloy. I could state many good reasons: incoherency, blusterous, poisonous and torturous use of the English Langauge. In fact, I will go farther. He is so incoherent, the contrived goop you hear from Michelle Malkin, Mr. Limbaugh, and Mr. Hanity sound relatively benign in comparison.

Constantly calling the Bushes(in the Bush Administration days) the “Bush crime family.” I mean not just once in a while, so constant in was painful to listen to. Basically he comes off as so bewildered by his own wondering referencing that he loses focus on an issue.

Another reason to call in the Rubber truck to get him to a Rubber room:

Calling Tim Russert(while he was living): “Media Whore Number One”.  Tim Russert?

He wanted to be there when Glenn Beck commits suicide? Come on.  I mean to a normal lib(believe me they do exist) this man is a disgrace: for he embodies everything we despise about the way right wing conducts it’s radio/tv programs.  But unlike the Conservative radio, Malloy can’t make the big greens that Hanity and Beck can make. Not even close. Why? One reason:  Because too many normal libs find him distasteful. While I am sure many people on the right would  support Glenn Beck even if he put “black face” on and marched around Fox news studio singing “Camptown Races”. Libs, I hope, see what I see in Mike Malloy.

Now, if you can’t find it in your heart to find the man disgraceful and/or incoherent, compare him to how Rush Limbaugh talks to his audience. You may not like what Mr. Limbaugh says, and his obsession with President Clinton’s sexual practices are sort of disturbing, he is an effective speaker.

Let me explain why it’s so hard listening to Mike Malloy and try  to keep what he is saying straight, because as confusing as this moron is, he confuses me even more.

  He sounds Like a hippie totally stoked on some mushroom or weed trying to explain quantum psychics to a child; that’s how bad it is.  And the repetition of words he uses. “ Whore, whore, whore.”

I think too many progressive(including myself) over use that word.  But  Mr. Malloy interjects it so often that  what ever point he is trying to make seemed drowned out by his hyperbolic words.

What I am saying is; although, I believe conservative right is not really furthering the cause of social discourse, liberals like Mike Malloy on the left that should know better, and who for whatever  reason, can not use  reason to persuade their audience but instead uses divisive terminology that increase their volume, but not their coherency:  This I have no use for.

Black man transforms into white man: a republican dream?

I suppose I would put this under: “HAVE YOU SEEN THIS?” OR “WHAT THE . . ?”  And further more, why? I don’t think this is particularly a racial issue, although I can see how either left or the right might try to make it so. It just looks like  a bad editing decision? Maybe it should be put under: “Huh?”

Michelle Malkin proudly displaying her Race Card

Close up of her conservative issued(?) Race Card.

The only time you will ever see Mrs. Malkin use her own race card. It’s when criticized for being a racist. duh!

Why Mrs. Malkin’s Race Card works: here is an ancient post in 2002, by Paul Fallavollita:

Malkin elicits support from many sectors of the Right because Whites feel as though her friendly presence “lets them off the hook.” They tell themselves, “Thank God she’s out there saying what needs to be said about the immigration problem, so now we can let her do the work and just point to her as a Filipina in our defense when the liberals whip out the race card on us.” Whites are using Malkin to absolve themselves of their natural responsibility to fight their own battles, and to salve their consciences at the same time. They need not feel embarrassed by their cowardice as long as Malkin is there on the beat. What a spectacle, though—a transplanted Filipina pulling America’s chestnuts out of the fire.

This predates  Mrs. Malkin’s poorly researched and revisionist book on internment camps.

Her objective book, Unhinged in 2005, showed that she had, indeed,  a softer side(for herself).  Complaining that the racism was aimed at her(and of course,  rationalized her own treatment of other people) In one chapter called “You are one sick gook.” And talking as a lib, I can only say that it’s disappointing that such talk comes out of the lefts’ mouth. But, equally you will also hear such talk from the right(you won’t hear that from Mrs. Malkin? not as long as she as her white man by her side, anyway) Is this her race card? You bet.  And she will use it over and over and over, etc.

Catering to semi-racist, and conspiracies of government take over of schools, Mrs, Malkin again is attempting to substitute fact with innuendo. Yes, you guessed it. She uses fear for the children defense. Why is she always using children? You think she is doing it for libs like me? No way. It’s for the people that make her money on her site.

Again, Mrs. Malkin distorts, and propagates gossip that most be at least Jim Crow age bias: meaning appeal to people still living pre-civil rights era.

What Mrs. Malkin failed to mention in another story in USA Today. I am sure she just  “over looked it.”

 To count them, the Census Bureau first has to find them. Complicating the task is a widespread climate of suspicion about personal data landing in the wrong hands and government’s increased surveillance power.

 Much of the unease is engendered by the growing problem of identity theft and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. New anti-terrorism measures such as the Patriot Act expanded the authority of law enforcement agencies here and abroad. The Census vows confidentiality, but new state and local laws that aim to crack down on undocumented immigrants are making even some legal immigrants nervous.

It appears that this one of the reason that the Census department is trying get the word out, even in schools: Fear.

The title of her blog,  implying that kids in school will be the new census “collectors”, is as misleading as much of her “fact finding” is. 

Even in her blog she quotes, stupidly actually, from the USA Today article, which is free of any gossipy none facts, clearly states its promotional only. This countrdicts the inane title she chose to use. I betting that most of the people that read her blog have no concept how the Census is performed.  I am quoting, in part, once again what Mrs. Malkin used.

The goal is to send posters, teaching guides, maps and lesson plans to every school in the nation, Puerto Rico and U.S. island territories to encourage everyone to participate in the national count. The materials will land in more than 118,000 schools and reach 56 million students. “It’s great to reach the children because children are such strong voices in their homes,” says Renee Jefferson-Copeland, chief of the Census schools program. “In households that are linguistically isolated, they can express the information to their parents.”

Notice something she forgot? Yet another reason for promoting the 2010 Census in the first place. “In households that are linguistically isolated, they can express the information to their parents.”

If she knew what it might have been like to be a immigrant, or no, if her husband did not  ghost-writing for her again, the idea of  using schools to discuss the 2010 Census seems like a good idea.

Now, If you are resilient enough to scroll down to the comment section, you will find a whole-in-the-head Malkinbots throwing around a lot of nothing. But, of course, they have that constitutional right, just as the constitution mandates the Census every ten years.

Notice the barbs she sends out: forcing gossipy goop down your throat.(without any evidence, by the way.) Here is a snippet from Mrs. Malkin’s blog on the 2010 Census:

If Team Obama could send their ACORN foot soldiers into taxpayer-funded schools to collect Census data, they would

Wow, facts? Just playing on the fears of conservatives without evidence?  Mrs. Malkin,  tries to assert that somehow ACORN is part of the Obama Administration? Could I tempt people to believe that Blackwater was a military arm of the Bush administration in Iraq  by just saying it? Yes, if my whole intent was to replace gossip and innuendo as fact.

 Now, Mrs. Malkin  and the other truth deniers are not only conservatives that distrust the 2010 Census, it is just about everyone else.

Being what the Gagasphere is there are others like Malkin, who might have joined the bandwagon of paranoia to garner some traffic to her site. However, this Gagasphere is  full of painfully misinformed bigots, well informed bigots, insane leftists, insane rightists, who is wrong? who is right?

An important note here, and something that Mrs. Malkin also forgot  did not mention.

It’s FREE!!!

The 2010 Census, like the census before them, is not something that is forced on individual Americans or legal or illegal immigrants. But don’t be surprised that the Republicans, although squeamish about  the census, will take it. Why, of course, it’s about the money.

Obama children, as invisioned by Michelle Malkin.

How a pair of shorts makes Michelle Obama “Fair game.”

A while ago, our lady of ethnic provilers, decided to go after Michelle Obama’s shorts. How is this an issue? In fact, it isn’t. It’s good old fashion mockery:

Hint about the sort of  mockery Malkin practises: It is more then trying to make fun of someone. It’s about ridiculing and demeaning someone you don’t like or respect. Sort of frat jealousy. The sort of mockery that goes on when one woman dislikes the way another may dress? Yes, pretty much that level of thought.

Why this concentration on Michelle Obama? Why? Because Mrs. Malkin knows the libs hate it: and her army of Malkinbots, love her for it. It keeps Mrs. Malkin’s audience fed, and keeps the audience coming in. Yes, as I said before, it’s the money!

However, the is another reason for this:

There is a sense that a lot of Conservatives are finding it difficult to hit at President Obama directly.  What better then going after the first lady that has been accused, with out any direct evidence, of any wrong doing.

What next: if you can sort of channel Mrs. Malkin’s mind. What would the Malkinbots like next.? Go after the Obama kids? After Schip , do not put it past the sensitive mind of  Michelle Malkin. She rationalised going after a  12 year old, because the democrats used this same  12 year old during a radio address.  So it makes it alright? Of course it does, the Malkinbots have to be fed, as I stated before.

One can see how libs despise Mrs. Malkin. Her comments and those commentors on Michelle Obama’s fashion sense is not only bizarre, this blogger tries to rationalize her thinking. Of the 134 comments made, I noticed one commenter actually raised the specter of common sense, saying that critiqueing Obama on her way of dress and not sticking the policy problems of the Obama administration, is, maybe, not cool. However, yet, just when I thought reason seem to seep into this site, one commentor wrote in response:

“You’re right in some aspect. We delve too easily into cheap comments about her figure or looks,(guilty) but, comments regarding her slovenly appearance with regards to the degradation of the White house or the Presidency, I think are fair game.”

Translation: So according to the way I was raised(rich and white)  I think Michelle Obama should dress like every first lady. And since  all of them were white, She better get off her black high horse and look like all the other first ladies.

The fact that this commentor uses the word “slovenly”  makes one wonder  what kind of rules Mrs. Malkinand her malkinbots thinks the First Lady should abide by.  Their own?

 And somehow she ties this one none issue to  money hungry husband ghost- written book, Culture of Corruption. There is nothing that Michelle Obama could do to make it right.(sorry about the pun)

If Michelle Obama had to walk a tight rope everyday, Malkin would remark: “why can’t the first lady walk in a straight line?”  I am just waiting for Mrs. Malkin to talk about the Obama children. Maybe they should wear burkas? But wow, what that would to Malkin? It would be a field day for every racist that goes to her site.

Maybe, if Mrs. Malkin has such a hard on about internment camps, we ought to put all those silly black people wearing shorts in camps until they can prove they are loyal pants wearing Americans.  Good observation Mrs. Malkin. I am sure that Goebbels  is smiling in grave knowing that his propaganda against non-Christians non-whites continues under you. You go Asian ethnic denier, you go!!!

Bill O'Reilly and his Pimp

Given up true journalism after leaving CBS, O’Reilly seemed to hit his stride in the ego enhancement that is conservative talk radio. Taking a rule book from Rush Limbaugh:  Forget fact checking and the truth, and even more importantly make your program a circus that is totally geared to make money.

And then when Fox comes along and makes him their little whore, well, it was match made in Heaven.

The important thing to remember when viewing O’Reilly’s show: he really doesn’t care about the issues. He cares that his demographic cares. Dixie chicks? No, never cared about them. But his demographic  despises any critique, true or not, of President Bush. So he went after them.

With Dr. George Tiller, O’Reilly’s  on going slander and name calling(which i reciprocate here rather liberally) of this man. His demographic needed him again. And again. And after Tiller was assassinated? He blamed  Joan Walsh of Salon? It is not that he hates Joan Walsh or even Dr. Tiller, but having Joan Walsh on his show so he could treat her like a whore, made his show and his demographic rise. 

There is no doubt he is a good business man, amassing a fortune on the body of Dr. Tiller, and others. And it’s always fascinating to watch someone  that spends so much time pandering to an audience that is too dull to see through him.

On the Aug. 19 Episode of the Daily Show,  Jon Stewart points out the ironic shift reflected in Fox News. Supporting people at the health care town halls, yet mocking and ridiculing Iraq protesters years previously.  They are liberals now.

I think it’s important to point out that Bill O’Reily is a very well educated man. He has a masters degree in both public Administration and broadcast journalism.  The fact he can use gutter language,  paparazzi techniques and  yelling pointlessly at his guest, is sort of misleading. He seems quite aware of his lowered level and ultimate decaying journalism. If you had seen the man in the early 1980′s, would you have recognised him? 

But what you see now is a man that decided to take the check. He took the money and damned any qualifications for journalistic standards. 

And what is so telling when he tries to mock a mocker like Jon Steward? He is not talking to all of us, but the poor sheep; yes his demographics that do not have a clue to what irony and hypocrisy-laced  humor might be.

It is not doubt that O’Reilly knows exactly what Steward was saying.  But to admit to that would bring down his rating.  Now why would he do that?

Bill O’Reilly makes the case for the pocket book. This is no dummy, he just ”acts”  like one on TV.

M v.s M? or Is it just in Malkin's $$$ mind?

The First Lady of  Half-Truths, Michelle Malkin, is at it again. Selling her book is a job that is never done!!! 

She “reports” on her blog that Michelle Obama has caught the eye of  the Washington Republicans and that [they]  are “taking a renewed interests in the role Mrs. O and her Chicago crony friends.”

 Quick translation: I don’t have any real “sources” to prove that Michelle Obama is corrupt or was involved in “dumping” of patients in her last career, but if the National Spectator says it’s true, then you know it must be.

Mrs. Malkin, however, always treading between “could of been a very good Journalist” and that of a incompetent commentator obsessed with making large amounts of cash, facts be damned! did sight the Washington Post, perhaps blinded by the kid gloves that they often treat her with. This report  is actually a more balanced and thoughtful story then you would ever get from someone only interested in politics as a monetary source of income.

What they did report is much different. That the Urban Health Initiative that Michelle Obama helped launch, is not quite working well. Ya, ok, it sucks? Maybe. The report in the Washington Post, and if Mrs. Malkin was paying attention, states “Those involved in the effort in Chicago say that they are hopeful but that it is too soon to judge its success.”

No where in the report do you hear the word “crony”.

So the First Lady Of Half-Truths is after Michelle Obama, why?

Does Mrs Malkin, who has stated that she is an American, not Asian, hates her, No. But her readers do. A black First Lady. My God!

It must be the continued ire of those bent on believing black people want to  “get back at whitey.” And are not proud of this country until a black president was elected. I am sure Michelle Malkin knows exactly how to feed the rabid mouth of Michelle Obama haters.

Also, in her Blog, she makes the Michelle V.S Michelle claim. Or really?

Another Quick translation:  Can you see Michelle Obama, frowning then crinkle her nose, and say in a puzzled way, “Malkin who?” Damn you First Lady for totally ignoring me. I got to make money off you!!!

Go Gett”em Mrs. Malkin: go make money of the half-truths of Michelle Obama.  It’s never a disgrace to be a bottom feeder: anyway you can make money legally in this country, then even bottom feeders have a right to write.

In March of 2005 , Terri  died.  And thus died also the hope of many conservatives of keeping her alive along with their ratings on this issue. Glenn Beck offered to buy(this blog author’s word for it) Terri Shiavo off Richard Shivio’s hands, and this was met with a disgusted. To be fair, Glenn Beck was not  the only one that wanted to buy this woman.

Staged? Would Glenn Beck shell out that kind of do back then?

But now he works for the Fox network, he can certainly afford it. I say we should root for Glenn Beck. We should not condemn him just because he calls the president a “racist”(having no proof of it, and perhaps because of temporary amnesia, forgetting  that President Obama’s  mother and grandmother, both of whom raised him, were white.).  No, we should applaud him.

Not only for trying to turn Terri Shiavo into his on personal prostitute, but spreading unconfirmed or unconfirmable statements about the president being a racist. 

Fear mongering like whore mongering relies on pushing out the products

Listen, the man’s got to make some money!

FOX AND LOU: A MATCH MADE IS BIASED HEAVEN

Is there is just coincidence that Lou Dobbs of CNN has finely hit on something conservative bloggers and even Fox news commentators, like  Bill O’Reilly, won’t even touch?

The Birther movement: the belief that some how unlike the rest of us that have been born in this country, and we can prove it by getting our own State birth certificate, President Barack Obama can not prove it the same way as the average American can?

According to Lou Dobbs, you have to go through loops to prove your legal birth right?  That is, without doing any Journalistic uncovering of his own, Dobbs was able to keep this issue alive: when most conservatives killed it at prenatal stage. It’s a tactic that Lou Dobbs , who had been a once respected Journalist at CNN especially in the days of Monyline, is  continuing his  interest with: Provoking instead of reporting. What happened to this well respected man? Is he gearing up for his stint on the Fox network? Clearly he is ready for it.

Lou you have past the screen test of unfair and unbalanced bias.

GO, LOU, GO!!!

Why?  Why only the conservatives? The Culture of Corruption is on the non-fiction best seller list and not one regular(elite, if you like) blog or newspaper, or cable network, other than FOX, has taken the lead and reviewed her new book. Oh, a few comments snip at her heels.

I am sure it is not because of her inability to do research effectively. Much like the racially disturbing book she wrote on the Japanese Interment Camps, which was not only a poor attempt to rewrite history

Whose the Joker here?

but also a best seller marketing tool. Mrs. Malkin never bothered with an eye of objectivity, meaning she used innuendo based mostly on Operation Magic: decyphered messages intercepted by the United States Government.

 The irony? And the justification? They were so secret, only a handful people knew what they contained. But what they ultimately contained was little or no evidence that any Japanese were involved in spying on America. Further, look at it this way: why put children in these camps? And then why the wide spread hate of the Japanese? Why not the Germans Americans? The Italians Americans? She never seemed to have done enough research to tell her audience that many governors of western States did not want these “rats” and they had no knowledge of these “secret” decryption, which by the way are pretty much silent on who or which (Japanese) were spying on America. And why not review the role of Gen. Dewitt? Who proclaimed a “Jap was a Jap.” And this from the commander of these internment camps? Nice.

 Or is the it more visceral? Liberal news watchers find her offending? Did she use Asian Americans to make a Best seller? Some of those scummy little liberals might say. Why on Earth do you want someone like that on your show? And , as some liberals think that she has made a bestseller out of her new book by making Michelle Obama her little whore?

 Thus Japanese Americans, Michelle Obama become selling points for her book rather then actually doing research. Look how Mathews of Hardball who had her on the show where she tried to assort that Sen. Kerry actually shot himself during the Vietnam War, according to her “sources”. This, ultimately, she could not prove, hence her almost crying fit at the end of the interview.

 It would be simple to say she hates colored people(having said racial background, then getting married to Jesse Malkin and suddenly then disavowing her racial background).That by having and gaining a white man as her husband she as gain the goal of many greedy people(male or female), and not only becoming monetarily successful but racially exorcised.

 Or is it fear? Do some fear actually taking her on? A child of the eighties. What I mean is: she and her (according to some sources, co-author of all her books, Jesse Malkin)took on the PC, political correctness, of the of ’80s campuses and saw a gold mine that keeps on giving. And still gives today. Using the PC of the ’80s which did exist I am sorry to say, because some still use it as an excuse even now to bash other people, as a sort of reverse victimization of all the angry conservative white people. Who can stand up against such a former Asian, who, in fact, says she is only “American” not “Asian?”

And slanders Japanese Americans, immigrants, and strangely with a degree of paranoia that can only appropriated by right wing kkk members, Rachael Ray. And only reason she can do this is because she does look Asian.

Hence the paradox, and the reason she knows(as well as her husband Jesse, who by now is clearly seen as her pimp), that anything she says about either Asians, Mexicans, Rachel Ray, will not really make her look like a racist or as she put it concerning President Obama, “racial opportunist.” Hiding, not hiding behind the color of her skin makes liberals either shake their heads or take some pot (like conservatives all now liberals do!). Now we come to Michelle Obama, which Mrs. Malkin uses as a way to make another best seller.

Why does she hate successful black women?

Is it because Mrs. Malkin, knowing in her heart of hearts that she is white, it is deeply offended to hear a black women criticize the white people that were keeping her down. Implying that in Chicago in the 1960′s, 1970′s and 1980′s there was no racism, and being black and a woman during that time had nothing to do with it, because Mrs. Malkin knows being white woman, that argument does not work because that would imply racism actually existed, not only in the 60′s, 70′s and 80′s but in the time of the Japanese Internment Camps.

This is the obvious question after reading Culture of Corruption. It is not much finding evidence that the Obama Administration has done wrong. But rather that because of past alleged cronyism, they will continue what they began in Chicago. Not based on facts, mind you, but on the rhetoric. That “you have to judge them by their rhetoric, and if you look at the gap between the rhetoric and the reality, this has to be one of the most corrupt administrations in recent memory.” Basing corruption on rhetoric? And not facts? What kind of fact checking is that?  However, Mrs. Malkin sinks in deep and tells us that is exactly what will happen. That the America we all love(that is white Americans loved pre-1980′s PC generation of bleeding heart empathizers)will be crushed by these uppity black people that just shuffled dirt and money into their coffers, and will continue to do so while bringing in more poor immigrants from Latin America and Africa and thus ridding America of Americans.

Or is it systemic of something deeper? Pandering to the right is easier(and makes the traffic to her site more palatable)then looking at Michelle Obama with a objective eye. In the eyes of all those white faces that read her blogs, saying that Michelle Obama did not raise her self up, but instead was lifted by white men, despite her own hard work, appeals to a base that think that people of color are just too snippy about how whitey treated minorities. Again, if Michelle Malkin was a real white person which she pretends not to be, then she would be seen as a racist.

 Michelle Malkin, secretly white, but uses her own race to hide that fact she makes money off all the angry white hate out there?

 That is the wonder of America, she can say the President is a racial “opportunist” and while others can call her a hypocrite that uses race to make money or make her husband- pimp, happy.

 It’s the reason we should always support her views, because in the end, truth is out there(somewhen) And using the “B” word to describe her is just lowering one self. Personally, if I wanted to make money in this blog, I would try for subtlety. Instead of using the “B” word as some people do, say that she is “secretly white” so her husband-pimp will always love her. It’s funnier and not as nasty as some Liberals who can’t control their English. Shame on you, Liberals! Get to the most common denominator: She doesn’t want to be white, she just thinks she is white.

 It is the wonder and the blessing of America. We can be anything we want, even if we don’t look a certain color, we can damn well act like we are that color!