A few months ago, our queen of fear the Muslims posted this column at townhall. Here is a snippet:
America faces an ongoing Islamic jihad at home and abroad. Not merely “man-caused.” But Koran-inspired. Yet, Obama refuses to spell out the centuries-old roots of the war that he claims he’ll win faster, better and cleaner than any of his predecessors.
Note to self: weird right wing language logic: since most jihads are made by “man” why even use the word “caused”? Is there a implication that some people think that Katrina caused the new Jihad??? or something. Since the Koran was written by “man” . . .oh forget it, I am already confused.
Note to self: still waiting for the “islamic Jihad” here in America. MMM I am still Waiting!!!
Another source, but which is yet to be confirmed, says that when Michelle Malkin learned that Hosni Mubarak would be visiting the White House August 19, she grew angry, and the source which apparently came from someone that over heard a cell phone conversation of someone else saying at a local bar in a seedy side of Hollywood, Florida. That. . .”Islam is all Obama’s fault.” And accused his wife, Michelle Obama, not only of being a crony, but also of not dressing like a Real first lady, and that the first lady is ” helping her husband promote Islam.” All of this can not yet be confirmed but boy does that sound like Michelle Malkin.
Today, on Fox News Sunday,(the only news outlet he dares go on), he said that Obama “scares the hell out of me” This is in regard to the investigation of Justice Department in to the CIA “interrogations” Why so glum Mr. Cheney? Afraid they will find your Dark Lord lightsabar?
UPDATE TO POST: The author of this post would like to offer his apologies for misquoting former vice-president Cheney: Mr. Cheney’s actual responds to the calls for an investigation into “enhanced interrogation techniques” was that he was, “offended as hell.” You can see it here.
Catering to semi-racist, and conspiracies of government take over of schools, Mrs, Malkin again is attempting to substitute fact with innuendo. Yes, you guessed it. She uses fear for the children defense. Why is she always using children? You think she is doing it for libs like me? No way. It’s for the people that make her money on her site.
Again, Mrs. Malkin distorts, and propagates gossip that most be at least Jim Crow age bias: meaning appeal to people still living pre-civil rights era.
What Mrs. Malkin failed to mention in another story in USA Today. I am sure she just “over looked it.”
To count them, the Census Bureau first has to find them. Complicating the task is a widespread climate of suspicion about personal data landing in the wrong hands and government’s increased surveillance power.
Much of the unease is engendered by the growing problem of identity theft and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. New anti-terrorism measures such as the Patriot Act expanded the authority of law enforcement agencies here and abroad. The Census vows confidentiality, but new state and local laws that aim to crack down on undocumented immigrants are making even some legal immigrants nervous.
It appears that this one of the reason that the Census department is trying get the word out, even in schools: Fear.
The title of her blog, implying that kids in school will be the new census “collectors”, is as misleading as much of her “fact finding” is.
Even in her blog she quotes, stupidly actually, from the USA Today article, which is free of any gossipy none facts, clearly states its promotional only. This countrdicts the inane title she chose to use. I betting that most of the people that read her blog have no concept how the Census is performed. I am quoting, in part, once again what Mrs. Malkin used.
The goal is to send posters, teaching guides, maps and lesson plans to every school in the nation, Puerto Rico and U.S. island territories to encourage everyone to participate in the national count. The materials will land in more than 118,000 schools and reach 56 million students. “It’s great to reach the children because children are such strong voices in their homes,” says Renee Jefferson-Copeland, chief of the Census schools program. “In households that are linguistically isolated, they can express the information to their parents.”
Notice something she forgot? Yet another reason for promoting the 2010 Census in the first place. “In households that are linguistically isolated, they can express the information to their parents.”
If she knew what it might have been like to be a immigrant, or no, if her husband did not ghost-writing for her again, the idea of using schools to discuss the 2010 Census seems like a good idea.
Now, If you are resilient enough to scroll down to the comment section, you will find a whole-in-the-head Malkinbots throwing around a lot of nothing. But, of course, they have that constitutional right, just as the constitution mandates the Census every ten years.
Notice the barbs she sends out: forcing gossipy goop down your throat.(without any evidence, by the way.) Here is a snippet from Mrs. Malkin’s blog on the 2010 Census:
If Team Obama could send their ACORN foot soldiers into taxpayer-funded schools to collect Census data, they would
Wow, facts? Just playing on the fears of conservatives without evidence? Mrs. Malkin, tries to assert that somehow ACORN is part of the Obama Administration? Could I tempt people to believe that Blackwater was a military arm of the Bush administration in Iraq by just saying it? Yes, if my whole intent was to replace gossip and innuendo as fact.
Now, Mrs. Malkin and the other truth deniers are not only conservatives that distrust the 2010 Census, it is just about everyone else.
Being what the Gagasphere is there are others like Malkin, who might have joined the bandwagon of paranoia to garner some traffic to her site. However, this Gagasphere is full of painfully misinformed bigots, well informed bigots, insane leftists, insane rightists, who is wrong? who is right?
An important note here, and something that Mrs. Malkin also forgot did not mention.
The 2010 Census, like the census before them, is not something that is forced on individual Americans or legal or illegal immigrants. But don’t be surprised that the Republicans, although squeamish about the census, will take it. Why, of course, it’s about the money.
A while ago, our lady of ethnic provilers, decided to go after Michelle Obama’s shorts. How is this an issue? In fact, it isn’t. It’s good old fashion mockery:
Hint about the sort of mockery Malkin practises: It is more then trying to make fun of someone. It’s about ridiculing and demeaning someone you don’t like or respect. Sort of frat jealousy. The sort of mockery that goes on when one woman dislikes the way another may dress? Yes, pretty much that level of thought.
Why this concentration on Michelle Obama? Why? Because Mrs. Malkin knows the libs hate it: and her army of Malkinbots, love her for it. It keeps Mrs. Malkin’s audience fed, and keeps the audience coming in. Yes, as I said before, it’s the money!
However, the is another reason for this:
There is a sense that a lot of Conservatives are finding it difficult to hit at President Obama directly. What better then going after the first lady that has been accused, with out any direct evidence, of any wrong doing.
What next: if you can sort of channel Mrs. Malkin’s mind. What would the Malkinbots like next.? Go after the Obama kids? After Schip , do not put it past the sensitive mind of Michelle Malkin. She rationalised going after a 12 year old, because the democrats used this same 12 year old during a radio address. So it makes it alright? Of course it does, the Malkinbots have to be fed, as I stated before.
One can see how libs despise Mrs. Malkin. Her comments and those commentors on Michelle Obama’s fashion sense is not only bizarre, this blogger tries to rationalize her thinking. Of the 134 comments made, I noticed one commenter actually raised the specter of common sense, saying that critiqueing Obama on her way of dress and not sticking the policy problems of the Obama administration, is, maybe, not cool. However, yet, just when I thought reason seem to seep into this site, one commentor wrote in response:
“You’re right in some aspect. We delve too easily into cheap comments about her figure or looks,(guilty) but, comments regarding her slovenly appearance with regards to the degradation of the White house or the Presidency, I think are fair game.”
Translation: So according to the way I was raised(rich and white) I think Michelle Obama should dress like every first lady. And since all of them were white, She better get off her black high horse and look like all the other first ladies.
The fact that this commentor uses the word “slovenly” makes one wonder what kind of rules Mrs. Malkinand her malkinbots thinks the First Lady should abide by. Their own?
And somehow she ties this one none issue to money hungry husband ghost- written book, Culture of Corruption. There is nothing that Michelle Obama could do to make it right.(sorry about the pun)
If Michelle Obama had to walk a tight rope everyday, Malkin would remark: “why can’t the first lady walk in a straight line?” I am just waiting for Mrs. Malkin to talk about the Obama children. Maybe they should wear burkas? But wow, what that would to Malkin? It would be a field day for every racist that goes to her site.
Maybe, if Mrs. Malkin has such a hard on about internment camps, we ought to put all those silly black people wearing shorts in camps until they can prove they are loyal pants wearing Americans. Good observation Mrs. Malkin. I am sure that Goebbels is smiling in grave knowing that his propaganda against non-Christians non-whites continues under you. You go Asian ethnic denier, you go!!!
The First Lady of Half-Truths, Michelle Malkin, is at it again. Selling her book is a job that is never done!!!
She “reports” on her blog that Michelle Obama has caught the eye of the Washington Republicans and that [they] are “taking a renewed interests in the role Mrs. O and her Chicago crony friends.”
Quick translation: I don’t have any real “sources” to prove that Michelle Obama is corrupt or was involved in “dumping” of patients in her last career, but if the National Spectator says it’s true, then you know it must be.
Mrs. Malkin, however, always treading between “could of been a very good Journalist” and that of a incompetent commentator obsessed with making large amounts of cash, facts be damned! did sight the Washington Post, perhaps blinded by the kid gloves that they often treat her with. This report is actually a more balanced and thoughtful story then you would ever get from someone only interested in politics as a monetary source of income.
What they did report is much different. That the Urban Health Initiative that Michelle Obama helped launch, is not quite working well. Ya, ok, it sucks? Maybe. The report in the Washington Post, and if Mrs. Malkin was paying attention, states “Those involved in the effort in Chicago say that they are hopeful but that it is too soon to judge its success.”
No where in the report do you hear the word “crony”.
So the First Lady Of Half-Truths is after Michelle Obama, why?
Does Mrs Malkin, who has stated that she is an American, not Asian, hates her, No. But her readers do. A black First Lady. My God!
It must be the continued ire of those bent on believing black people want to “get back at whitey.” And are not proud of this country until a black president was elected. I am sure Michelle Malkin knows exactly how to feed the rabid mouth of Michelle Obama haters.
Also, in her Blog, she makes the Michelle V.S Michelle claim. Or really?
Another Quick translation: Can you see Michelle Obama, frowning then crinkle her nose, and say in a puzzled way, “Malkin who?” Damn you First Lady for totally ignoring me. I got to make money off you!!!
Go Gett”em Mrs. Malkin: go make money of the half-truths of Michelle Obama. It’s never a disgrace to be a bottom feeder: anyway you can make money legally in this country, then even bottom feeders have a right to write.