Why We Would Love To Love Michelle Malkin: Even Liberals.

September 23, 2009
Admit it Libs you like this woman!

Admit it Libs you like this woman!


I must admit that my girlfriend is a Filipina. I freely give that information to you. She beautiful, polite and kind.

Which makes the idea of the whole concept of  the Filipina American Michelle Malkin so puzzling, and to many moderate liberals that truly want to be inclusive. This woman makes it too difficult. She destroys public discourse by ridiculing and snipping at the heals others. She assumed what was in President Obama’s speech to the nations children, without knowing the contents of that speech. And that is just one case of many.  It is so hard for libs to understand her thinking. Especially men. They look at her, and Damn, she is so sweet looking, but once that mouth opens, real objectivity loses out. We all lose.

She is gorgeous, smart and  I sometimes admiring her, then sometimes wondering if she is being coached by Satan himself. Yet, what is more important is that other more moderate or lesser dangerous  thinking people can look at her without cringing. Case in point: Howard Kurtz’s Ode to the hoty Michelle Malkin and Lloyd Grove’s softball telephone interview(Malkin’s having been threaten so much because of her inane and poor research and so finds it too scary to go out sometimes.) Both season news men, yet they softly go through the questions, and nothing other than a “Look, how cute and smart and rich she is” is really obtained from both interviews. Although it sounds like I am being mocking. Not on your life! I am proud that people, these two men, in fact, could even do such a thing in the present climate of hate left, hate right.  They represent something Mrs. Malkin could never be accused of: objective(well, mildly) journalism.


Shame on Liberals:Where is are the libs when it came to Acorn?

September 16, 2009
Where are the Liberals on this?

Where are the Liberals on this?

When employees were caught doing some underhand stupity at Acorn, who found out first? Looks like someone did their homework. His name is  James O’Keefe, a conservative film maker. And it was not a season journalist, as Jon Steward, a liberal fake journalist, had rightly mentioned? And if you look closely you will find most liberal online publications do not even cover the blip. The right wing found out, good for them.

James O'Keefe raises some interesting questions about Acorn

James O'Keefe raises some interesting questions about Acorn

 But why don’t liberals follow up and denounce such behavior? Has the Huffington Post done so? Why only liberals like  Jon Steward?

The Real Face Of Rep. Joe Wilson

September 12, 2009


Rep. Joe "You Lie!" Wilson's true face.

Rep. Joe "You Lie!" Wilson's true face.



Back-To-School Speech=socialism?

September 4, 2009
The Nut Crusade begins?

The Nut Crusade begins?

Have conservatives finally gone over the deep end? Jim Greer, GOP chairman of Florida complained in a news Propaganda release that the president is playing politics and using the children to “spread President Obama’s socialist ideology”., Michelle Malkin and Glenn Beck also join the nut crusade on a 15 minute speech. So, tell me, Can these people who have not seen the transcripts of this speech,  read what is in the President’s mind?

In Defense of Children: Malkin Uses Our Children Again And Again

September 2, 2009
Razer wire and children don't mix: A picture that was never in Michelle Malkin's Book on  japanese internment

Razer wire and children don't mix: A picture that was never in Michelle Malkin's Book on japanese internment

Mrs. Malkin has a shiny new toy. Bash the President over the head using children. Trying to anticipate what the president might say in his upcoming address on Sept 8: what the conservatives call a stay-in-school speech, Mrs. Malkin in all her honest objective gossipy best ties him with left wing philosophy, and of course leaving out for the readers any possibility of waiting to hear the speech themselves, and make judgements for themselves.   As if not Stalking children was not enough, now Mrs. Malkin is going after the president. So what is she saying? Schools are not safe for your children anymore because this black president is in charge now?

Remember now this woman as a long history of using children to make her point. Think about how she tries to argue things.

In 2004, she wrote a thinly researched book “In defense of Racism Internment. What she realized, more she took advantage of , was the idea in 2004 people did not know (or cared anymore?) about what happen in 1942 or that the 1980’s ism culture of political correctness had posion young minds. If you do read her book note she does not spend any time talking about the children.  Of the 110,00 half, at least  were children. American children put in internment camps?

The book In defense of Internment Camps is not so much an indictment of Japanese nationals as well as US citizens, but a systematic bashing of the 1980 PC culture in which Mrs. Malkin grew to despise. Rationalizing, like many conservatives that this movement to multicultural, and other “isms”(which this author really never got into) was to blame for the poor victim mentality. It not only made her rich, it is a continuous form she revisit over and over.

This problem is that rationalizing 1942, where the rights of Minorities was slim at best: She never bothered to put it in context. And my contention is that she never bothered to research  indication that there was a hostile atmosphere against the Japanese during that time. What I mean is she Did NO RESEARCH on the idea that racism had something to do the internment camps. Instead she focuses on coded messages from MAGIC. She never even mentions the governors of the Western States and their xenophobic attitude toward the Japanese. Or even looked at the nationals laws during that time. The institutionalized racism of 1942 can never be compared to the strange, and weird 1980’s pop culture of Me!Me!Me! Jim Grow was very much alive during that time.

 Contextual errors does not make for a balanced and objective book, nor does rationalizing using children to make your point.   Every time children are involved in a topic Mrs. Malkin takes on, she spoon feeds people the rational that ” they used children, I can, too.”

Michelle Malkin’s Race Card: Hypocrisy At Its Finest

August 28, 2009


Michelle Malkin proudly displaying her Race Card

Michelle Malkin proudly displaying her Race Card

Close up of her conservative issued(?) Race Card.

Close up of her conservative issued(?) Race Card.

The only time you will ever see Mrs. Malkin use her own race card. It’s when criticized for being a racist. duh!

Why Mrs. Malkin’s Race Card works: here is an ancient post in 2002, by Paul Fallavollita:

Malkin elicits support from many sectors of the Right because Whites feel as though her friendly presence “lets them off the hook.” They tell themselves, “Thank God she’s out there saying what needs to be said about the immigration problem, so now we can let her do the work and just point to her as a Filipina in our defense when the liberals whip out the race card on us.” Whites are using Malkin to absolve themselves of their natural responsibility to fight their own battles, and to salve their consciences at the same time. They need not feel embarrassed by their cowardice as long as Malkin is there on the beat. What a spectacle, though—a transplanted Filipina pulling America’s chestnuts out of the fire.

This predates  Mrs. Malkin’s poorly researched and revisionist book on internment camps.

Her objective book, Unhinged in 2005, showed that she had, indeed,  a softer side(for herself).  Complaining that the racism was aimed at her(and of course,  rationalized her own treatment of other people) In one chapter called “You are one sick gook.” And talking as a lib, I can only say that it’s disappointing that such talk comes out of the lefts’ mouth. But, equally you will also hear such talk from the right(you won’t hear that from Mrs. Malkin? not as long as she as her white man by her side, anyway) Is this her race card? You bet.  And she will use it over and over and over, etc.

Census 2010: Michelle Malkin Again Uses Children: And Malkinbots Respond?

August 27, 2009



Catering to semi-racist, and conspiracies of government take over of schools, Mrs, Malkin again is attempting to substitute fact with innuendo. Yes, you guessed it. She uses fear for the children defense. Why is she always using children? You think she is doing it for libs like me? No way. It’s for the people that make her money on her site.

Again, Mrs. Malkin distorts, and propagates gossip that most be at least Jim Crow age bias: meaning appeal to people still living pre-civil rights era.

What Mrs. Malkin failed to mention in another story in USA Today. I am sure she just  “over looked it.”

 To count them, the Census Bureau first has to find them. Complicating the task is a widespread climate of suspicion about personal data landing in the wrong hands and government’s increased surveillance power.

 Much of the unease is engendered by the growing problem of identity theft and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. New anti-terrorism measures such as the Patriot Act expanded the authority of law enforcement agencies here and abroad. The Census vows confidentiality, but new state and local laws that aim to crack down on undocumented immigrants are making even some legal immigrants nervous.

It appears that this one of the reason that the Census department is trying get the word out, even in schools: Fear.

The title of her blog,  implying that kids in school will be the new census “collectors”, is as misleading as much of her “fact finding” is. 

Even in her blog she quotes, stupidly actually, from the USA Today article, which is free of any gossipy none facts, clearly states its promotional only. This countrdicts the inane title she chose to use. I betting that most of the people that read her blog have no concept how the Census is performed.  I am quoting, in part, once again what Mrs. Malkin used.

The goal is to send posters, teaching guides, maps and lesson plans to every school in the nation, Puerto Rico and U.S. island territories to encourage everyone to participate in the national count. The materials will land in more than 118,000 schools and reach 56 million students. “It’s great to reach the children because children are such strong voices in their homes,” says Renee Jefferson-Copeland, chief of the Census schools program. “In households that are linguistically isolated, they can express the information to their parents.”

Notice something she forgot? Yet another reason for promoting the 2010 Census in the first place. “In households that are linguistically isolated, they can express the information to their parents.”

If she knew what it might have been like to be a immigrant, or no, if her husband did not  ghost-writing for her again, the idea of  using schools to discuss the 2010 Census seems like a good idea.

Now, If you are resilient enough to scroll down to the comment section, you will find a whole-in-the-head Malkinbots throwing around a lot of nothing. But, of course, they have that constitutional right, just as the constitution mandates the Census every ten years.

Notice the barbs she sends out: forcing gossipy goop down your throat.(without any evidence, by the way.) Here is a snippet from Mrs. Malkin’s blog on the 2010 Census:

If Team Obama could send their ACORN foot soldiers into taxpayer-funded schools to collect Census data, they would

Wow, facts? Just playing on the fears of conservatives without evidence?  Mrs. Malkin,  tries to assert that somehow ACORN is part of the Obama Administration? Could I tempt people to believe that Blackwater was a military arm of the Bush administration in Iraq  by just saying it? Yes, if my whole intent was to replace gossip and innuendo as fact.

 Now, Mrs. Malkin  and the other truth deniers are not only conservatives that distrust the 2010 Census, it is just about everyone else.

Being what the Gagasphere is there are others like Malkin, who might have joined the bandwagon of paranoia to garner some traffic to her site. However, this Gagasphere is  full of painfully misinformed bigots, well informed bigots, insane leftists, insane rightists, who is wrong? who is right?

An important note here, and something that Mrs. Malkin also forgot  did not mention.

It’s FREE!!!

The 2010 Census, like the census before them, is not something that is forced on individual Americans or legal or illegal immigrants. But don’t be surprised that the Republicans, although squeamish about  the census, will take it. Why, of course, it’s about the money.