A Census Worker Dead: Conservatives and Liberals Play Victim, and Whipping Up the Base

September 29, 2009
Far, far left and right: they love keep things Whipped

Far, far left and right: they love keep things Whipped

William E. Sparkman is dead. We don’t know all the details of the Census Worker’s death. We don’t the why and the how. But it never stops those that are so politically polarizing from dragging this man, his family and his friends through the ringer. From Michelle Malkin, who constantly plays the victim of  the left, while goading her followers chase after people she dislikes, to Dan Riehl, who apparently, never even attempted fact-checking or let’s say Google, speculated that Mr. Sparkman had some sexual deviance, or the democratic underground that basically blamed the right for his death.

Meanwhile, the truth has been whipped, torn, and ultimately ruined for all of us all. Poor us



In Defense of Children: Malkin Uses Our Children Again And Again

September 2, 2009
Razer wire and children don't mix: A picture that was never in Michelle Malkin's Book on  japanese internment

Razer wire and children don't mix: A picture that was never in Michelle Malkin's Book on japanese internment

Mrs. Malkin has a shiny new toy. Bash the President over the head using children. Trying to anticipate what the president might say in his upcoming address on Sept 8: what the conservatives call a stay-in-school speech, Mrs. Malkin in all her honest objective gossipy best ties him with left wing philosophy, and of course leaving out for the readers any possibility of waiting to hear the speech themselves, and make judgements for themselves.   As if not Stalking children was not enough, now Mrs. Malkin is going after the president. So what is she saying? Schools are not safe for your children anymore because this black president is in charge now?

Remember now this woman as a long history of using children to make her point. Think about how she tries to argue things.

In 2004, she wrote a thinly researched book “In defense of Racism Internment. What she realized, more she took advantage of , was the idea in 2004 people did not know (or cared anymore?) about what happen in 1942 or that the 1980’s ism culture of political correctness had posion young minds. If you do read her book note she does not spend any time talking about the children.  Of the 110,00 half, at least  were children. American children put in internment camps?

The book In defense of Internment Camps is not so much an indictment of Japanese nationals as well as US citizens, but a systematic bashing of the 1980 PC culture in which Mrs. Malkin grew to despise. Rationalizing, like many conservatives that this movement to multicultural, and other “isms”(which this author really never got into) was to blame for the poor victim mentality. It not only made her rich, it is a continuous form she revisit over and over.

This problem is that rationalizing 1942, where the rights of Minorities was slim at best: She never bothered to put it in context. And my contention is that she never bothered to research  indication that there was a hostile atmosphere against the Japanese during that time. What I mean is she Did NO RESEARCH on the idea that racism had something to do the internment camps. Instead she focuses on coded messages from MAGIC. She never even mentions the governors of the Western States and their xenophobic attitude toward the Japanese. Or even looked at the nationals laws during that time. The institutionalized racism of 1942 can never be compared to the strange, and weird 1980’s pop culture of Me!Me!Me! Jim Grow was very much alive during that time.

 Contextual errors does not make for a balanced and objective book, nor does rationalizing using children to make your point.   Every time children are involved in a topic Mrs. Malkin takes on, she spoon feeds people the rational that ” they used children, I can, too.”

Michelle Malkin actually loves Islam

September 1, 2009


Michelle Malkin actually says something nice about Islam?

Michelle Malkin actually says something nice about Islam?


Wonders of wonders, in a 2005 column for the white only,  Christian only website townhall,  Mrs. Malkin tells us something positive about Islam. I just about to give up on her in ability to be objective.  Here are her own words:

Nothing to see here. Move along. Islam is a peaceful religion. Stop asking so many damned questions.

Truly amazing!!!!


                     And I lived to see her say something nice???

Rude Update: Sept 25th.2009, Sorry, she was actually mocking the religion. Taking in the peaceful people along with the more angry wing of Islam, and not distinguishing the difference. Sounds a little like religious intolerence?

Michelle Malkin Blames Obama For Islam

August 30, 2009


"Islam in America? Over my dead body!"

"Islam in America? Over my dead body!"

A few months ago, our queen of fear the Muslims posted this column at townhall. Here is a snippet:

America faces an ongoing Islamic jihad at home and abroad. Not merely “man-caused.” But Koran-inspired. Yet, Obama refuses to spell out the centuries-old roots of the war that he claims he’ll win faster, better and cleaner than any of his predecessors.

Note to self: weird right wing language logic:  since most jihads are made by “man” why even use the word  “caused”? Is there a implication that some people think that Katrina caused the new Jihad??? or something. Since the Koran was written by “man” . . .oh forget it, I am already confused.

Note to self: still waiting for the “islamic Jihad” here in America. MMM I am still Waiting!!!

Another source, but which is yet to be confirmed, says that when Michelle Malkin  learned that Hosni Mubarak would be visiting the White House August 19, she grew angry, and the source which apparently came from  someone that over heard a cell phone conversation of someone else saying at a local bar in a seedy side of Hollywood, Florida. That. . .”Islam is all Obama’s fault.”  And accused his wife, Michelle Obama, not only of being a crony, but also of not dressing like a Real first lady, and that the first lady is ” helping her husband promote Islam.” All of this can not yet be confirmed but boy does that sound like Michelle Malkin.

Cheney Accuses Obama of “scaring the hell out of me.”

August 30, 2009


Dick Cheney, The Dark Lord himself, speaks again?

Dick Cheney, The Dark Lord himself, speaks again?

Today, on Fox News Sunday,(the only news outlet he dares go on), he said that Obama “scares the hell out of me” This is in regard to the investigation of Justice Department in to the CIA “interrogations”  Why so glum Mr. Cheney? Afraid they will find your Dark Lord lightsabar?


UPDATE TO POST:  The author of this post would like to offer his apologies for misquoting former vice-president Cheney: Mr. Cheney’s actual responds to the calls for an investigation into “enhanced interrogation techniques” was that he was,  “offended as hell.”  You can see it here.

Then There Is The left: Mike Malloy: He Makes The Conservative Right Sound Conherent

August 29, 2009
Mike Malloy as invisioned by normal Liberals

Mike Malloy as envisioned by normal Liberals

Possibly the greatest gift Air America Radio gave us all was its decision to fire Mike Malloy. I could state many good reasons: incoherency, blusterous, poisonous and torturous use of the English Langauge. In fact, I will go farther. He is so incoherent, the contrived goop you hear from Michelle Malkin, Mr. Limbaugh, and Mr. Hanity sound relatively benign in comparison.

Constantly calling the Bushes(in the Bush Administration days) the “Bush crime family.” I mean not just once in a while, so constant in was painful to listen to. Basically he comes off as so bewildered by his own wondering referencing that he loses focus on an issue.

Another reason to call in the Rubber truck to get him to a Rubber room:

Calling Tim Russert(while he was living): “Media Whore Number One”.  Tim Russert?

He wanted to be there when Glenn Beck commits suicide? Come on.  I mean to a normal lib(believe me they do exist) this man is a disgrace: for he embodies everything we despise about the way right wing conducts it’s radio/tv programs.  But unlike the Conservative radio, Malloy can’t make the big greens that Hanity and Beck can make. Not even close. Why? One reason:  Because too many normal libs find him distasteful. While I am sure many people on the right would  support Glenn Beck even if he put “black face” on and marched around Fox news studio singing “Camptown Races”. Libs, I hope, see what I see in Mike Malloy.

Now, if you can’t find it in your heart to find the man disgraceful and/or incoherent, compare him to how Rush Limbaugh talks to his audience. You may not like what Mr. Limbaugh says, and his obsession with President Clinton’s sexual practices are sort of disturbing, he is an effective speaker.

Let me explain why it’s so hard listening to Mike Malloy and try  to keep what he is saying straight, because as confusing as this moron is, he confuses me even more.

  He sounds Like a hippie totally stoked on some mushroom or weed trying to explain quantum psychics to a child; that’s how bad it is.  And the repetition of words he uses. ” Whore, whore, whore.”

I think too many progressive(including myself) over use that word.  But  Mr. Malloy interjects it so often that  what ever point he is trying to make seemed drowned out by his hyperbolic words.

What I am saying is; although, I believe conservative right is not really furthering the cause of social discourse, liberals like Mike Malloy on the left that should know better, and who for whatever  reason, can not use  reason to persuade their audience but instead uses divisive terminology that increase their volume, but not their coherency:  This I have no use for.

White Face, Black Hand.

August 28, 2009

Fresh from the Gagasphere.

Black man transforms into white man: a republican's dream?

Black man transforms into white man: a republican dream?

I suppose I would put this under: “HAVE YOU SEEN THIS?” OR “WHAT THE . . ?”  And further more, why? I don’t think this is particularly a racial issue, although I can see how either left or the right might try to make it so. It just looks like  a bad editing decision? Maybe it should be put under: “Huh?”