Child Shock Video, And The Enslavemnt Of Children: Michelle Malkin And Company use…You know The Drill

September 29, 2009
Save Your kids from being used! Hurry!

Save Your kids from being used! Hurry!

Michelle Malkin while her parent’s home country is being flooded and children die, the pointless Tucker Carlson who compares President Obama to Khmer Rouge, everyone that works for Fox news, believe that a video of children singing during Black History month, Praising President Obama, was a Hitler “indoctrination” video. Of course, never really understanding hypocrisy, you heard complete silence when a pro-Bush video of children singing was unearthed.  I am sure that the conservatives knew that this is a none issue; it’s just that the morons that want to believe in indoctrination will believe it.

           So let’s recap:

Michelle Malkin, the pointless Tucker Carlson, everyone that works for Fox news, never tiring from using children to get at the Democrats or any left leaning human being, are truly like pedophiles. 

 

Yes, you heard it here first. The Conservative pundits are enslaving our children to crush the left. Prove me wrong!

                


Then There Is The left: Mike Malloy: He Makes The Conservative Right Sound Conherent

August 29, 2009
Mike Malloy as invisioned by normal Liberals

Mike Malloy as envisioned by normal Liberals

Possibly the greatest gift Air America Radio gave us all was its decision to fire Mike Malloy. I could state many good reasons: incoherency, blusterous, poisonous and torturous use of the English Langauge. In fact, I will go farther. He is so incoherent, the contrived goop you hear from Michelle Malkin, Mr. Limbaugh, and Mr. Hanity sound relatively benign in comparison.

Constantly calling the Bushes(in the Bush Administration days) the “Bush crime family.” I mean not just once in a while, so constant in was painful to listen to. Basically he comes off as so bewildered by his own wondering referencing that he loses focus on an issue.

Another reason to call in the Rubber truck to get him to a Rubber room:

Calling Tim Russert(while he was living): “Media Whore Number One”.  Tim Russert?

He wanted to be there when Glenn Beck commits suicide? Come on.  I mean to a normal lib(believe me they do exist) this man is a disgrace: for he embodies everything we despise about the way right wing conducts it’s radio/tv programs.  But unlike the Conservative radio, Malloy can’t make the big greens that Hanity and Beck can make. Not even close. Why? One reason:  Because too many normal libs find him distasteful. While I am sure many people on the right would  support Glenn Beck even if he put “black face” on and marched around Fox news studio singing “Camptown Races”. Libs, I hope, see what I see in Mike Malloy.

Now, if you can’t find it in your heart to find the man disgraceful and/or incoherent, compare him to how Rush Limbaugh talks to his audience. You may not like what Mr. Limbaugh says, and his obsession with President Clinton’s sexual practices are sort of disturbing, he is an effective speaker.

Let me explain why it’s so hard listening to Mike Malloy and try  to keep what he is saying straight, because as confusing as this moron is, he confuses me even more.

  He sounds Like a hippie totally stoked on some mushroom or weed trying to explain quantum psychics to a child; that’s how bad it is.  And the repetition of words he uses. ” Whore, whore, whore.”

I think too many progressive(including myself) over use that word.  But  Mr. Malloy interjects it so often that  what ever point he is trying to make seemed drowned out by his hyperbolic words.

What I am saying is; although, I believe conservative right is not really furthering the cause of social discourse, liberals like Mike Malloy on the left that should know better, and who for whatever  reason, can not use  reason to persuade their audience but instead uses divisive terminology that increase their volume, but not their coherency:  This I have no use for.


Michelle Malkin: Michelle Obama isn’t white enough for this blogger.

August 25, 2009
Obama children, as invisioned by Michelle Malkin.

Obama children, as invisioned by Michelle Malkin.

How a pair of shorts makes Michelle Obama "Fair game."
How a pair of shorts makes Michelle Obama “Fair game.”

A while ago, our lady of ethnic provilers, decided to go after Michelle Obama’s shorts. How is this an issue? In fact, it isn’t. It’s good old fashion mockery:

Hint about the sort of  mockery Malkin practises: It is more then trying to make fun of someone. It’s about ridiculing and demeaning someone you don’t like or respect. Sort of frat jealousy. The sort of mockery that goes on when one woman dislikes the way another may dress? Yes, pretty much that level of thought.

Why this concentration on Michelle Obama? Why? Because Mrs. Malkin knows the libs hate it: and her army of Malkinbots, love her for it. It keeps Mrs. Malkin’s audience fed, and keeps the audience coming in. Yes, as I said before, it’s the money!

However, the is another reason for this:

There is a sense that a lot of Conservatives are finding it difficult to hit at President Obama directly.  What better then going after the first lady that has been accused, with out any direct evidence, of any wrong doing.

What next: if you can sort of channel Mrs. Malkin’s mind. What would the Malkinbots like next.? Go after the Obama kids? After Schip , do not put it past the sensitive mind of  Michelle Malkin. She rationalised going after a  12 year old, because the democrats used this same  12 year old during a radio address.  So it makes it alright? Of course it does, the Malkinbots have to be fed, as I stated before.

One can see how libs despise Mrs. Malkin. Her comments and those commentors on Michelle Obama’s fashion sense is not only bizarre, this blogger tries to rationalize her thinking. Of the 134 comments made, I noticed one commenter actually raised the specter of common sense, saying that critiqueing Obama on her way of dress and not sticking the policy problems of the Obama administration, is, maybe, not cool. However, yet, just when I thought reason seem to seep into this site, one commentor wrote in response:

“You’re right in some aspect. We delve too easily into cheap comments about her figure or looks,(guilty) but, comments regarding her slovenly appearance with regards to the degradation of the White house or the Presidency, I think are fair game.”

Translation: So according to the way I was raised(rich and white)  I think Michelle Obama should dress like every first lady. And since  all of them were white, She better get off her black high horse and look like all the other first ladies.

The fact that this commentor uses the word “slovenly”  makes one wonder  what kind of rules Mrs. Malkinand her malkinbots thinks the First Lady should abide by.  Their own?

 And somehow she ties this one none issue to  money hungry husband ghost- written book, Culture of Corruption. There is nothing that Michelle Obama could do to make it right.(sorry about the pun)

If Michelle Obama had to walk a tight rope everyday, Malkin would remark: “why can’t the first lady walk in a straight line?”  I am just waiting for Mrs. Malkin to talk about the Obama children. Maybe they should wear burkas? But wow, what that would to Malkin? It would be a field day for every racist that goes to her site.

Maybe, if Mrs. Malkin has such a hard on about internment camps, we ought to put all those silly black people wearing shorts in camps until they can prove they are loyal pants wearing Americans.  Good observation Mrs. Malkin. I am sure that Goebbels  is smiling in grave knowing that his propaganda against non-Christians non-whites continues under you. You go Asian ethnic denier, you go!!!


O’REIllY’S EGO SHOW,AGAIN? The real Tiller Killer tries mocking a mocker.

August 22, 2009
Bill O'Reilly and his Pimp

Bill O'Reilly and his Pimp

Given up true journalism after leaving CBS, O’Reilly seemed to hit his stride in the ego enhancement that is conservative talk radio. Taking a rule book from Rush Limbaugh:  Forget fact checking and the truth, and even more importantly make your program a circus that is totally geared to make money.

And then when Fox comes along and makes him their little whore, well, it was match made in Heaven.

The important thing to remember when viewing O’Reilly’s show: he really doesn’t care about the issues. He cares that his demographic cares. Dixie chicks? No, never cared about them. But his demographic  despises any critique, true or not, of President Bush. So he went after them.

With Dr. George Tiller, O’Reilly’s  on going slander and name calling(which i reciprocate here rather liberally) of this man. His demographic needed him again. And again. And after Tiller was assassinated? He blamed  Joan Walsh of Salon? It is not that he hates Joan Walsh or even Dr. Tiller, but having Joan Walsh on his show so he could treat her like a whore, made his show and his demographic rise. 

There is no doubt he is a good business man, amassing a fortune on the body of Dr. Tiller, and others. And it’s always fascinating to watch someone  that spends so much time pandering to an audience that is too dull to see through him.

On the Aug. 19 Episode of the Daily Show,  Jon Stewart points out the ironic shift reflected in Fox News. Supporting people at the health care town halls, yet mocking and ridiculing Iraq protesters years previously.  They are liberals now.

I think it’s important to point out that Bill O’Reily is a very well educated man. He has a masters degree in both public Administration and broadcast journalism.  The fact he can use gutter language,  paparazzi techniques and  yelling pointlessly at his guest, is sort of misleading. He seems quite aware of his lowered level and ultimate decaying journalism. If you had seen the man in the early 1980’s, would you have recognised him? 

But what you see now is a man that decided to take the check. He took the money and damned any qualifications for journalistic standards. 

And what is so telling when he tries to mock a mocker like Jon Steward? He is not talking to all of us, but the poor sheep; yes his demographics that do not have a clue to what irony and hypocrisy-laced  humor might be.

It is not doubt that O’Reilly knows exactly what Steward was saying.  But to admit to that would bring down his rating.  Now why would he do that?

Bill O’Reilly makes the case for the pocket book. This is no dummy, he just “acts”  like one on TV.


LOU DOBBS TAKING THE FOX NEWS SCREEN TEST?

August 18, 2009
FOX AND LOU: A MATCH MADE IS BIASED HEAVEN

FOX AND LOU: A MATCH MADE IS BIASED HEAVEN

 

Is there is just coincidence that Lou Dobbs of CNN has finely hit on something conservative bloggers and even Fox news commentators, like  Bill O’Reilly, won’t even touch?

The Birther movement: the belief that some how unlike the rest of us that have been born in this country, and we can prove it by getting our own State birth certificate, President Barack Obama can not prove it the same way as the average American can?

According to Lou Dobbs, you have to go through loops to prove your legal birth right?  That is, without doing any Journalistic uncovering of his own, Dobbs was able to keep this issue alive: when most conservatives killed it at prenatal stage. It’s a tactic that Lou Dobbs , who had been a once respected Journalist at CNN especially in the days of Monyline, is  continuing his  interest with: Provoking instead of reporting. What happened to this well respected man? Is he gearing up for his stint on the Fox network? Clearly he is ready for it.

Lou you have past the screen test of unfair and unbalanced bias.

GO, LOU, GO!!!